01/01/2019
Luke 2:16-21 The shepherds went in
haste to Bethlehem and found Mary and Joseph, and the infant lying in the
manger. When they saw this, they made known the message that had been told them
about this child. All who heard it were amazed by what had been told them by
the shepherds. And Mary kept all these things, reflecting on them in her heart.
Then the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all they had heard
and seen, just as it had been told to them. When eight days were completed for
his circumcision, he was named Jesus, the name given him by the angel before he
was conceived in the womb.
Today’s homily is going to be rated
PG-13, so I hope that all the minors here are accompanied by an adult in
church. The reason it will be PG-13 is because I want to reflect on the
original feast of January 1, which was not Mary, Mother of God. In 1962,
January 1 was changed to today’s feast of the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God.
But do you know what it was prior to that date? It was called “The Feast of the
Circumcision of Christ and the Holy Name.” Now, do you all know what the
medical procedure of circumcision is, or do I need to show you slides? Indeed,
that is what we read in Luke’s gospel today: “When eight days were completed
for his circumcision, he was named Jesus, the name given him by the angel
before he was conceived in the womb.” Eight days have passed since Christmas
and Jesus’ birth, and it is time for the Lord’s circumcision and bestowing the
name of Jesus upon him.
Interestingly, do you know when
babies are baptized in my home country of India? When they are eight days old.
Why? Well, baptism is the New Testament equivalent of the circumcision of the
Old Testament. In ancient Israel circumcision was proof that a male belonged to
the Chosen People – the proof was seen in the flesh – just like modern
Christian baptism is proof that we belong to the new Chosen People, Christians.
And what will we celebrate in two weeks’ time? The Baptism of Jesus in the
Jordan River by John. That new baptism by water will replace the old
circumcision with a razor! Thank God! Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament but he
also ushered in the New Testament.
But the feast of the circumcision
of Christ carried greater meaning than merely being a precursor of baptism. It
also symbolized the shedding of blood for our salvation. Saints and scholars up
and down the centuries have seen that “first cut” of the sacred Body of the
Savior as linked to the sacrifice of the Cross, where not only his foreskin but
all his skin was scourged and virtually ripped off his body. In other words,
Jesus did not only suffer and shed his blood for our salvation on Golgotha, but
he began to suffer for us in Bethlehem.
Jesus was given his name at the
same ceremony as the circumcision. As you probably know, his name in Hebrew is
“Yeshua” and it means “savior.” His work of saving us began at the same second
he received the name of Savior, Jesus. King of fitting, isn’t it? Archbishop
Fulton Sheen said, “Everyone comes into this world to live, but Jesus came into
this world to die.” And I would add: his dying began in seminal form (no pun
intended) at his circumcision, when he received the first cut.
Beginning a new year with the Feast
of the Circumcision has practical implications for us in 2019. Naturally, we
all pray for peace and prosperity in the next twelve months. Have you or others
prayed for that? Well, that’s a good thing to pray for. But there’s a good chance
we will also suffer: set-backs, stress and maybe even sabotage. In other words,
the coming year will also bring suffering. What will we do with those problems
and pains that will inevitably arise? Jesus gives us the perfect model to
follow: offer all our crosses from cradle to grave up to God for the salvation
of the world. St. Paul taught this explicitly to the Colossians in 1:24,
saying, “I rejoice in my suffering for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling
up what is lacking in the affliction of Christ on behalf of his body, which is
the church.” St. Paul may well have been thinking about his own circumcision
because he had been a devout Jew and a preeminent Pharisee. In other words, we
should accept our aches and agonies which we won’t avoid in 2019 as our own
little circumcisions, our first cut.
Finally, the feasts of the
Circumcision of Christ and Mary, Mother of God, are not really all that
different when you think about it. What I mean is that they both underscore the
humanity of Jesus, that he was truly a man. The circumcision highlights Jesus
masculinity and his consequent vulnerability: that he is fully a man and can
bleed. He is not an angel hovering happily above all human misery. Nothing
hurts a man more than getting hit in his manhood. And to state Mary is the
Mother of God is not intended to exalt her status as much as it serves to lower
Jesus status. The belief that Jesus had a human mother means that Jesus himself
must have a human nature. We read in Philippians 2:6-7, “Though he was in the
form of God, Jesus did not regard equality with God something to be grasped.
Rather he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human
likeness; and found human in appearance.” Because Mary is Mother of God, Jesus
can be the Son of a human mother and therefore be human himself. Like mother,
like son.
Both the old feast of the
Circumcision and the Holy Name, and the new feast of the Mary the Mother of God
focus on Jesus’ humility and his humanity. And that’s the important thing to
remember every January 1, and the 364 days that follow, namely, the first cut.
Praised be Jesus Christ!
No comments:
Post a Comment