Seeing the Eucharist as Bread for the bivouac
06/24/2024
After another lengthy hiatus, we
again board this train of homilies to virtually tour the Holy Land, the Fifth
Gospel. Remember our destination is to learn how the land shapes the liturgy.
The stones cry out to teach us the Good News. The second and third Masses (or
liturgies) are celebrated by Moses in Exodus 12 and by David in 2 Samuel 6.
Let’s look briefly at how these two primordial liturgies and try to understand
how the sacred stones of the Holy Land are uniquely equipped to teach some
profound lessons about the liturgy.
In Exodus 12, like we saw in
Genesis 14, God commands that the Israelites utilize bread (actually unleavened
bread) and wine as the principal component of their worship. Bishop Barron
write insightfully: “Just as trouble began with a bad meal – Adam and Eve
eating of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil – so
redemption is tied to a rightly ordered meal, commanded by God and serving to
bring the families of Israel together.”
For our purposes, though, we want
to examine how, besides the unleavened bread of the Passover supper, God
provided another symbol of the Eucharist in Exodus 16, the manna in the desert,
bread for the bivouac (a bivouac is a camping tent). When the restless people
complained of hunger on their journey, we read in Ex 16:14, “there was on the
face of the wilderness a fine, flake-like thing, fine as hoarfrost on the
ground.” In his untiring love, God would continuously provide this “food for
the journey” for forty years, until the people entered the Promised Land.
That is, through the rest of
Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and even to the end of Deuteronomy, God gives the
people manna for food as they walk. Hence, when Israel finally enters and
occupies the Holy Land the manna ceases. It is not until the beginning of the
book of Joshua that we read: “And the manna ceased on the next day, when they
ate of the produce of the land; and the sons of Israel had manna no more, but
ate of the fruit of the land of Canaan that year.”
In other words, the stones of the
Holy Land, witnessing the entry of the Chosen People into the Promised Land,
immediately understood the provisional purpose of the manna in the desert.
Thus, they teach us how the Eucharist is truly food for the Christian
pilgrimage through the wilderness of this world. That is, one day, we will no
longer need the earthly Manna of the Mass, because we, too, will eat “of the
produce of the land,” that is, of the produce of Paradise.
When a priest is called to the
hospital in the middle of the night because a Catholic is dying, he should
always take along not only the Holy Oils for the Last Rites, but also the
Blessed Sacrament for Holy Communion. Why? Well, because receiving Communion
for the last time is called Viaticum, literally meaning food for the journey,
Bread for the bivouac, indeed, when you strike your tent for the last time. A
Catholic having his last meal in the desert before crossing the spiritual
Jordan River into the Promised Land.
You may know that prisoners on
death row are often given a “last meal” before their execution. Some ask for
lobster, others for steak, some ask for scrambled eggs. But back in 1916, Roger
Casement was tried for treason in the United Kingdom. He converted to
Catholicism days before his execution by hanging. For his last meal, he asked
for Holy Communion, saying, I go “to my death with the body of my God as my
last meal.” Whatever controversies swirl around his life and legacy, Roger
Casement died in God’s good graces by receiving Viaticum, Bread for the
bivouac.
How then does the land teach us
about the liturgy? By witnessing how the manna stopped at the borders of the
Holy Land the stones “cry out” that the liturgy of the Eucharist will one day
be “retired” and replaced by the eternal liturgy of heaven. These earthly
Masses and liturgies are temporary, only preparing us for the eternal. And that
is an urgent lesson to learn because we sometimes think we will live forever on
earth, or at least we wish we could. But that is a grave error. But one day we
will die and fold up our tent, and the Fifth Gospel is trying to teach us that
lesson that real life begins in the Promised Land. In short, Grace will give
way to glory.
Let’s look at how King David
celebrates another “preliminary Mass” or liturgy in the Old Testament by
assuming the role of both priest and king, shades of Melchizedek. In 2 Samuel
6, David triumphantly escorts the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem to be
install and consecrate it as the prized showpiece of the Holy of Holies. Along
the way, ascending to Jerusalem, he puts on a linen ephod in 2 Sm 6:14
(priestly vestments, like modern priests wear a white alb), and distributes to
the people “a cake of bread, a portion of meat, and a cake of raisins” in 2 Sm
6:19.
David, imitating his predecessor
Melchizedek, a priest-king who shared a sacred meal with Abram, now shares a
sacred meal with the whole people of Israel. But I would like to draw your
attention not only to the meal of bread, wine, and meat but in particular to
the Ark of the Covenant, which contained the manna of the desert, the bread for
the bivouac. Here again the land will teach us something significant about the
liturgy.
We read in 2 Sm 6:15, “David and
all the house of Israel brought up the ark of the Lord with shouting, and with
the sound of the horn.” And surely those sacred stones “cried out” in
jubilation as they supported the sandaled feet of faithful pilgrims making that
ascent, especially the feet of Melchizedek’s successor in Jerusalem, the
priest-king David. The stones would prophesy like Isaiah: “How beautiful upon
the mountains are the feet of the one bringing good news” (Is 52:7).
For several years now on the
Sunday of Corpus Christi our parish participates in a liturgy of Eucharistic
Procession. We literally carry Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, shaded under a
square, embroidered canopy, throughout the city as we too sing and shout God’s
praises. What are we doing? We are imitating King David, who carried the Ark
with the manna into the city.
Pope Benedict XVI noted the
unmistakable parallels between the Ark’s entry into the city of David and
Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem, remarking: "This point is made most clearly
in Matthew’s account through the passage immediately following the Hosanna to
Jesus, Son of David: “When he entered Jerusalem, all the city was stirred,
saying, Who is this? And the crowds said: This is the prophet Jesus from
Nazareth of Galilee” (Mt 21:10-11)…Now the people were “quaking”: the word that
Matthew uses, eseísthē (seíō), describes the vibration caused by an earthquake."
And we all know how Luke records
Jesus’ reply to the Pharisees who told him to tell his disciples to stop
shouting “Hosannas”, answering: “I tell you, if they keep silent, the stones
will cry out” (Lk 19:40). Later, at the end of Holy Week, Matthew will recount
at Jesus’ crucifixion, “the earth shook, and the rocks were split” (Mt 27:51).
The stones of this land are literally “at pains” to teach us about the liturgy.
To summarize: the land of Israel
can teach us a profound liturgical lesson in urging the absolute
appropriateness and supreme importance of Eucharistic Processions. When we walk
through the streets of a city, singing and dancing with all our might like
David – to the point that his wife Michal felt he made a fool of himself (2 Sm
6:20) – and carried the Ark with the manna, we, too, should see a snapshot of
our whole life in these Eucharistic Processions.
How so? The entire Christian life
is a journey not just to the old Jerusalem on earth like Bishop Pohlmeier
invited me to take, but especially to the new Jerusalem in heaven. We dare not
forget to pack the Manna, the Bread for the bivouac, our “last meal” before we
die. And the stones of the Holy Land cannot contain their joy in teaching us
this liturgical lesson.
Praised be Jesus
Christ!
No comments:
Post a Comment