Learning to pray for our unbeloved dead
04/01/2026
John 13:21-33, 36-38 Reclining
at table with his disciples, Jesus was deeply troubled and testified,
"Amen, amen, I say to you, one of you will betray me." The disciples
looked at one another, at a loss as to whom he meant. One of his disciples, the
one whom Jesus loved, was reclining at Jesus' side. So Simon Peter nodded to
him to find out whom he meant. He leaned back against Jesus' chest and said to
him, "Master, who is it?" Jesus answered, "It is the one to whom
I hand the morsel after I have dipped it." So he dipped the morsel and
took it and handed it to Judas, son of Simon the Iscariot. After Judas took the
morsel, Satan entered him. So Jesus said to him, "What you are going to
do, do quickly." When he had left, Jesus said, "Now is the Son of Man
glorified, and God is glorified in him. If God is glorified in him, God will
also glorify him in himself, and he will glorify him at once. My children, I
will be with you only a little while longer. You will look for me, and as I
told the Jews, 'Where I go you cannot come,' so now I say it to you."
Simon Peter said to him, "Master, where are you going?" Jesus
answered him, "Where I am going, you cannot follow me now, though you will
follow later." Peter said to him, "Master, why can I not follow you now? I will lay down my life for you." Jesus
answered, "Will you lay down your life for me? Amen, amen, I say to you,
the cock will not crow before you deny me three times."
In all your spare time you should
someday read an enlightening little book by Hans Urs Von Balthasar called “Dare
We Hope ‘That All Men Be Saved’?” Even if you don’t fully understand his
theology – or entirely disagree with it – you may enjoy his editorial comments.
For example, he writes about how
both liberals and conservatives despise him: “So be it; if I have been cast
aside as a hopeless conservative by the tribe of the left, then I know what
sort of dung-heap I have been dumped upon by the right. But back to matters of
substance” (20). That is, it is when both the right and left castigate you that
you are closest to Christ.
The gist of Balthasar’s book is
that we can truly hope that all people be saved, even if in the end some people
are not saved. That sounds contradictory, but it’s not. In other words, the
future and final state of affairs – who ends up in heaven and who (if anyone)
falls into hell – does not need to blunt the edge of our hope for all men to be
saved. We can even translate that hope into prayer, not matter how wretched the
sinner.
Have you noticed how we offer
every Mass for a particular intention? I make a point to mention explicitly
that intention during the Prayers of the Faithful, or more simply, the
Petitions. Often, though not always, we pray for our beloved dead. And that is
certainly a holy and pious practice. But that does not preclude us praying for
our unbeloved dead, that is, people we consider our enemies on earth, people
who may not make it to heaven.
When you think about it, who
needs our prayers the most: clearly our foes more than our friends. And not
only because our prayers may help them, but mainly because our prayers help us.
That is, when we pray for our enemies, we love our enemies as Jesus taught us.
In other words, when we pray for our “unbeloved dead” our hearts soften toward
them, and then maybe we have hope that we will be saved.
Von Balthasar’s basic stance
toward who will be saved and who will be lost is essentially to plead
ignorance, or as we say, “to plead the fifth amendment.” He does not come down
on the side of either salvation or condemnation. That is, he lists the many scriptural
passages that teach the certainty of hell and the probability that many end up
there.
But he also marshals an
impressive list of Scriptures that teach how much God desires to save all men.
That was Jesus’ deepest desire on the Cross, as we heard at Mass a few days ago
Jesus say: “When I am lifted up I will draw all men to myself” in Jn 12:32.
Then Balthasar concludes: “What we have here are two series of statements that,
in the end, because we are under judgment, we neither can nor may bring into
synthesis” (21).
In baseball there’s a curious
rule called “tie goes to the runner,” meaning if it’s not clear if the runner
was safe or out at first base, then he is safe. Similarly, the Scripture
passages about salvation and damnation are sort of “tied” in the sense of how
many we can list on both sides of the ledger. And so we may hope that all the
runners – that is all humanity – will be saved.
In the gospel today we see
another example of how the tie goes to the runner. The beloved disciple John
asks Jesus who will betray him. And Jesus says watch for the signal of to whom
I will give the morsel of bread. But the gesture of sharing bread is not only a
sign of who will betray Jesus, but also a gesture of love, like when a bride
and groom feed each other a piece of wedding cake. In other words, the morsel
of bread is not only an indication of Judas, it was also an invitation to Judas
to think again about his course of action.
And perhaps it was also a last
ditch effort by Jesus that even after the betrayal Judas might remember our
Lord’s love and not despair – that is, repent like Peter did after his
betrayal. Even though Jesus knew what Judas planned to do – he knows everything
– he still held out hope that Judas might repent in the end and be saved. When
Jesus died on the Cross on Good Friday, he did not die only for our beloved
dead, but also for our unbeloved dead, like Judas.
It is interesting, and highly
instructive, that the Church has never declared that any individual person by
name is in hell, not even Judas. We declare certain people by name are in
heaven, the saints, because their miracles are proof of their presence in
Paradise. But we have no rock-solid proof that anyone, not even Judas Iscariot,
is in eternal hell. We have a lot of Scripture he might be, and we have an
equal number of Scripture he might not be. And if that’s the case, “the tie
goes to the runner.”
Praised be Jesus
Christ!

No comments:
Post a Comment