On the Feast of Pope St. John Paul II
22 October 2014
The poets love to sing that, “Love is a many splendored
thing.” Indeed, love can fly you to the
moon, or dump you in the depths of despair.
We can try to run from love and its strange power over us, but we cannot
hide. Pope St. John Paul II went so far
as to say, “Man [and woman] cannot live without love.” We can live without television, we can live
without alcohol, we can live without sunsets over the Pacific Ocean, but we
cannot live without love. Without love,
we will die. In his penetrating book,
Man’s Search for Meaning, Viktor Frankl gave powerful proof of how clinging to
love helped many survive the Nazi concentration camps. Without love, we will die; with love, we are
stronger than death.
But what is love, this “many splendored thing”? The Scriptures tell us where to start: “For
this is love: not that we have loved God, but that he has loved us” (1 John
4:10). That passage has baffled me for
years (and still does), but here’s one interpretation: love isn’t something WE
do first, but rather something GOD does first, and therefore something God has
to teach us. In other words, we make
many mistakes trying to love others.
Just think of all the ways you failed today: we love some people too
much (like our children) and we love other people too little (like our
enemies). So God has to show us how to
love properly and perfectly. What does
God teach us about love? St. John
continues, “And [God] sent his son as a sacrifice to take away our sins.” That is, God loves us for our benefit, not
for His own good. Genuine, true love seeks
first and foremost the good of the beloved, not its own good (although the
lover certainly benefits in the balance).
Love – at least, God-style love – is unselfish, and because it is
unselfish it feels like a sacrifice, it’s hard, it hurts. “He sent his son as a sacrifice.” At the heart of every true love is a gift:
something I freely and joyfully (often sacrificially) do for you. That is the first and most important lesson
of love.
Love again glitters in the limelight as the question of
love’s institutional expression, namely, marriage, grabbed the attention of the
Supreme Court of the United States. The
SCOTUS recently ruled that certain federal benefits should be granted to
same-sex couples, and declined to rule on California’s Proposition 8, which
effectively allowed same-sex marriage in that state, as well as every other
state. Since then, state after state has
conceded legal status to same-sex couples, and I believe the trend will
continue and gain momentum. But here’s
the fundamental problem: our culture and our country lack the philosophical and
constitutional principles to successfully stave off same-sex marriage becoming
“the new normal.” Why is that? As far back as 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville
made a piercing and prophetic observation in his book Democracy in America,
saying, “America is therefore one of the countries in the world where
philosophy is least studied, and where the precepts of Descartes are best
applied.” How so? He continued, “Everyone shuts himself up in
his own breast, and affects from that point to judge the world.” We “shut ourselves up in our own breast” when
love is what WE believe it is rather than letting God teach us what HE believes
it is. President John F. Kennedy
summarized accurately the prevailing American view of the separation of
religion from political life when, on September 12, 1960, he addressed the
Greater Houston Ministerial Association.
He said: “Whatever issue may come before me as President--on birth control,
divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject--I will make my decision in
accordance with these views [that is, the absolute separation of church and
state], in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national
interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could
cause me to decide otherwise.” While
Kennedy’s speech is laudable in many respects – and helped him get elected! –
it also evicted religion from its rightful role in the public square. When we refuse to allow God to teach us about
love, whether through Christianity or any other “religious megaphone” God uses
to speak to the world, “we shut ourselves up in our own breast.” We grope blindly in the dark, trying to grasp
at love either through trial and error, or democratic vote, or judicial fiat,
but we will come up short. We cannot
figure out what love is on our own; God must teach us.
Don’t misunderstand me, I don’t advocate throwing in the
political towel, or feel like Don Quixote charging a windmill. While it may be unlikely to stop same-sex
marriage gaining ground, some compromise solution is still possible and
desirable, like granting benefits to couples but not calling it marriage, or
individual states not capitulating or compromising at all, or strengthening
traditional marriages, etc. But I’m not
holding my breath. In the United States
and much of western civilization, love will indeed be a many splendored thing.
How do we live in this increasingly atheistic culture, where
God’s voice is “anathema” in the public square?
Let’s go back to Pope St. John Paul II, who said, “Man cannot live
without love.” I have several friends
who are homosexual. They are sincere,
courageous Catholics and I love them dearly.
John Paul’s statement is as true for them as for the couple happily
married for 50 years. Homosexual persons
cannot live without love. For that
matter, celibate priests cannot live without love (in case you’re
wondering). But we don’t crack the code
of love without divine help. We Christians
also look to Scripture that says love is a sacrificial gift; it seeks the
benefit of my beloved before my own happiness (and often at the price of my own
immediate happiness). That’s one reason
I chose to be a celibate priest, sacrificing my sexuality puts the needs of the
parish above my own desires. That’s why
dating couples choose chastity, seeking the holiness of their boyfriend or
girlfriend at a painful personal price.
But that’s the hard road; it’s the way of the cross. Not only is it hard to choose that, it’s
confounding to comprehend WHY we should.
That’s why God has to teach us what love is. Love is not what we think it is; love is what
God thinks it is.
For all who struggle to love – pretty much the whole human
race – the best way to learn about love is to fall in love with Jesus
first. Our Lord must be our “Significant
Other,” and our most Significant Other.
One day, a scribe asked Jesus, “Teacher, which is the greatest
commandment?” Jesus replied, “Love the
Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your
mind. This is the first and greatest
commandment.” Once you’ve mastered that,
you can move on to the second commandment, “love your neighbor as yourself”
(Mt. 22:37-39). I firmly believe that
anyone who loves God with all their heart and all their soul and all their mind
will choose what’s best for their beloved instead of what they want for
themselves, they will sacrifice their own desires (even sexual desires). Once you’ve learned to love God (and obey His
teachings), you’ll be in a better position to love your neighbor (even your
same-sex neighbor). Maybe a similar
conviction inspired St. Augustine to make the daring statement, “Love, and do
what you will.” I am convinced that any
person who loves Jesus (not the Jesus of our imagination, but the real Jesus)
with that kind of intensity will choose either heterosexual marriage or refrain
from sexual activity. Dag Hammerskjold,
secretary-general of the United Nations (1953-1961), voluntarily chose celibacy
for the sake of world peace. Mahatma
Gandhi and his wife chose to be celibate for the sake of Indian
independence. Same-sex couples, while
remaining in a deeply committed and warmly loving relationship (maybe even
enjoying the civil status of marriage), should refrain from sexual activity out
of love for God, and love for each other.
Love – God-style love – seeks the good of the beloved, often at a steep
personal cost. Any other “love” is a
chimera of our own making.
Anyway, when we get to heaven, all bets will be off on
marriage because there won’t be any marriage, same-sex or otherwise. “At the resurrection they neither marry nor
are given in marriage but are like the angels in heaven” (Mt. 22: 30) – that,
by the way, is the real Jesus talking.
Here’s a snap-shot of heaven: in some mysterious, mystical way, all
humanity will comprise the corporate “Bride” and our one “Spouse” will be
Christ. In heaven the heterosexuals
don’t win, and the homosexuals won’t win.
Only those who love Jesus will win.
Celibate priesthood anyone?