Appreciating both Letter of James and Galatians
02/22/2020
James 2:14-24, 26 What good
is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone says he has faith but does not have
works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and
has no food for the day, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, keep warm,
and eat well,” but you do not give them the necessities of the body, what good
is it? So also faith of itself, if it does not have works, is dead. Indeed
someone might say, “You have faith and I have works.” Demonstrate your faith to
me without works, and I will demonstrate my faith to you from my works.
Today we find an apparent, but not
an actual, contradiction in scripture. All students of the sacred page sooner
or later will read and wrestle with what on the surface seems like a clear
contradiction in St. Paul’s letter to the Galatians and the Letter of St. James
(today’s first reading). St. James says forcefully and uncompromisingly: “What
good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone says he has faith but does not
have works? Can that faith save him?” And, as if to answer his own rhetorical
question, James adds later: “faith without works is dead.” St. James
articulates one side of the debate between faith and works.
St. Paul presents the other side in
Galatians 2:16, arguing very ably as well: “We know a person is not justified
by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ.” And to add further
weight to his argument, he insists later: “by works of the law no one will be
justified.” Reading and reflecting on Galatians 2, the great Protestant
reformer Martin Luther uttered one of the two famous battle cries of the
Protestant Reformation, namely, sola fide,” meaning “faith alone.” The other
famous dictum was “sola scriptura,” or “by the bible alone,” (and not by
tradition) do we know the truth faith and therefore know Christ. Indeed, Luther
even criticized the Letter of James by calling it “an epistle of straw.” We
know straw is worth little more than to be thrown in the fire.
Let me say two things about this
apparent contradiction that fueled a blazing controversy that smolders down to
our own day. First of all, St. Paul’s use of the term “works of the law” is
distinctly different from St. James use of the same term when he says “faith
without works.” Paul is referring to the hundreds of Jewish laws and liturgies,
rituals and regulations, known as the “oral law,” or “halakha.” Paul was not
referring to keeping the Ten Commandments as useless for justification. St.
Paul did not believe you could profane the Lord’s Day (3rd commandment), or
commit adultery (6th commandment) steal (7th commandment) or murder (5th
commandment) and still be justified. That’s the Decalogue, you dummy! These are
divine commandments, not human customs, and St. Paul was eliminating the
second, not the first.
By the way, this is also why in
Acts 15 the apostles, including Paul, under Peter’s leadership, decide that
circumcision would no longer by required for Christians. Do you know what
circumcision is? Would you like me to describe it for you? Just kidding.
Circumcision was one of those “works of the law” that does not justify a person
before God, and therefore the apostles abolished it. Archbishop Sartain once
told me: “John, there are laws, and then there are laws.” That is, some laws
you have to keep absolutely and others you can bend or break with impunity,
like run red lights in Fort Smith. So, the contradiction between the Letter of
James and St. Paul’s letter to the Galatians disappears. When the two apostles
use the word “works” they mean two different things.
The second point I want to add
briefly touches the second battle cry of the Protestant Reformation, “sola
scriptura.” That is, the bible alone will lead us to Christ without the aid of
tradition. Now, that sounds good on the surface, but it crumbles under closer
scrutiny. We can simply ask one question: Why are some Christians called
Lutheran and others called Presbyterian, and still others considered Catholics
or Baptists or even non-denominational? The honest answer is that each
denomination – even the so-called non-denominational – follows a certain
“tradition” of interpreting scripture. In other words, scripture alone – sola
scriptura – does not explain itself; someone must help us understand the bible.
By the way, I always love to read
Acts chapter 8, where an Ethiopian eunuch is reading Isaiah 53 about the
“suffering servant.” St. Philip is sent by the Holy Spirit to evangelize him.
St. Philip asks him if he understands what he is reading. The eunuch’s answer
is one that we can all share whenever we open and read the bible. He replied
very humbly: “How can I understand unless someone instructs me?” In other
words, no one can understand scripture alone, including me, unless someone
instructs us. And that instruction the Philip provided the Ethiopian eunuch,
and that I’m giving you now, and that Luther gave to his adherents in the
1500’s, is simply called “tradition.” Sola scripture is “an impossible dream.”
The Protestant positions of sola
fide and sola scriptura sound good but don’t stand up to scrutiny. Keep that in
mind as we continue to read the magnificent Letter of St. James, that “epistle
of straw.”
Praised be Jesus
Christ!